Doug Sipp: Misinformed... AGAIN!
In his typical
unprofessional “journalistic” fashion, Doug Sipp has erroneously accused two
prominent physicians of being associated with questionable individuals and
organizations. In a previous blog dated May 15, 2012 Sipp accused Dr.
Nabil Dib, the Director, Cardiovascular Research, Catholic Healthcare West
(CHW) Mercy Gilbert and Chandler Regional Medical Centers, Phoenix, AZ;
Director, Clinical Cardiovascular
Cell Therapy Associate Professor of Medicine University of California, San
Diego; Founder and President, International Society for Cardiovascular
Translational Research (ISCTR); Founder, Co-Editor-in-Chief, Journal of
Cardiovascular Translational Research (JCTR) of serving as "Chief of Staff
of the stem cell transplant clinic at Stowe Biotherapy, a discredited stem cell
company. Had Sipp employed the most basic journalism 101 standards, and
fact checked his information regarding Dr. Dib, he would have discovered that
Dr. Dib was never associated with Stowe in any capacity. In fact, Dr. Dib
and the University of California, San Diego, formally requested that Stowe
remove him from his website and any other correspondence connecting him with
Stowe. A simple phone call to Dr. Dib would have confirmed that he had no
relationship with Stowe and that Stowe had been using Dr. Dib's name,
credentials and status in the field of cardiology without permission. In researching the web for any affiliation
between Stowe Biotherapy and Dr. Dib, one only finds two documents, both of
which were produced by Stowe Biotherapy and posted by Frantech, a franchise
licensing company.
In
the same blog, Sipp attempts to discredit Dr. Jackie See, another well-known
interventional cardiologist, by implying that Dr. See's affiliation with the
California Stem Cell Treatment Center somehow compromises his integrity as a
medical professional. It is important to note that Jackie See, MD, FACC
is a Board certified internist, a Fellow of the American College of Cardiology
and a pioneer of the specialty of interventional cardiology. He is
founder of the teaching program of interventional cardiology at the University
of California, Irvine School of Medicine. Dr. See is well published in
peer-reviewed journals and is a member of several prestigious medical and
scientific organizations.
Sipp
also fails to point out that the California Stem Cell Treatment Center, a
highly reputable company, specifically states on
their website (http://stemcellrevolution.com) that
they do not "....offer stem cell therapy as a cure for any condition,
disease or injury." They state they TREAT conditions. They do
not purport to "CURE". He would know that if he spent
a little more time on their web site.
Stem Cell Revolutions
mission is as follows:
"To advance
cell technology in order to improve the body's ability to regenerate. “
“At the California Stem
Cell Treatment Center, we provide care for people suffering from diseases that
may be alleviated by access to adult stem cell based regenerative treatment.
The Center utilizes a fat transfer surgical technology to isolate and implant
the patient’s own stem cells from a small quantity of fat harvested by
liposuction on the same day. Patients who seek care at the California Stem Cell
Treatment Center are evaluated by a respective member of our multispecialty
expert panel of Board Certified physicians representing many medical fields.
The California Stem Cell Treatment Center emphasizes quality and is highly committed
to clinical research and the advancement of regenerative medicine."
In spite of Sipp's
inference, Dr. See has never had a violation with the FDA and to this day is a
respected physician in good standing with the California Medical
Association. Over his distinguished career he has been a scientific
advisor for many biotechnology companies and has participated in dozens of
clinical trials in cardiovascular disease and diabetes.
Sipp's careless attempt to
discredit Dr. See is yet another example of his yellow journalism; he
selectively takes information without context and makes unethical assertions
about the character and behavior of highly credentialed medical
professionals. Mr. Sipp’s reporting; clearly, Mr. Sipp’s neglectful and
inaccurate portrayal of Drs. Dib and See, is a deliberate attempt to besmirch
and otherwise damage the reputation, professional efforts and good standing of
these doctors. While Mr. Sipp positions himself within the “Stem Cell Treatment
Monitor” blog as “independent of my affiliation to any organization”, it is
100% clear to those within the industry that Mr. Sipp is an employee of the
Riken Research Institute. In fact, in all collateral materials and from
all introductions at industry events where he participates, Mr. Sipp makes it
very clear that he heads up the Science Policy and Ethics Studies Unit of the
Riken Research Institute. It is through the funding and support of Riken
that he is able to establish his credibility and use this platform within the
stem cell industry to say whatever he wants regardless of the factual basis for
those comments.
Mr Sipp would do well to do his due diligence and dig a little
deeper before he puts pen to paper.